Questions and answers
11.02.2003
Rolf Thiesies is a dear Rainer, my name. I read the lines on your home page attentively and interestedly. In the age, the many unanswered questions are getting for us even more conscious because we need answer around our thinking and behavior understand but also around to understand that what proceeds around us today. I even is née in 1951 since in 1992 I deal more intensively with questions of religion and Weltgeschichte.Meine questions were at that time like yours. Therefore, I immediately ventured on your HP. If you like, we can like to continue to communicate on this path. Since now 10 years talk I with varied people about god and the world. I would like to tell you my knowledge. Today I can do that happen around me correctly in the stream of the time put in order. Much what me very much worried, sees I today from a very different viewing angle. Nobody from the circle this one the/that self in mine, children and Jugenzeit for my education and world opinion responsibly felt, could answer my questions. Very much, the studies of diverse reading of the Jehovah's Witnesses helped for me. I do not know whether you before had a good look at it. Warscheinlich but not because then had a little different you the contents of your HP gestaltet.Wenn like to you like, we can do us on this paths of far austauschen.Herzlichst Rolf Thiesies
Answer:
Hello, thank you for your mail. I know the Jehovah's Witnesses' brochures. I find much well off but if man thinks logically, the literal interpretation of the Bible is wrong. The kingdom is a dream that many have and it lasts beautiful if it really be könte. I do not want to destroy this dream. He is an frür many people the hope and the most important in the life. The Bible is one of the most essential books into our culture circle and gave us the Richtlienien e.g. which the good and the evil is. Therefore I share with you also many opinions and your faith is not absolutely in the resaying with my theory. Nevertheless you see the essence god as a person, what corresponds under no circumstances to the truth. That which we call god is the whole. Each of living beings (also we) is a part of it. Surely, it is for him possible to accept a virituelle appearance that could be regarded as a god, however. I is convinced that influences the writers of the Bible of the whole partly or steered were. You/they had to write, however, it like that that the people of the former time could understand this. Man was writing that therefore, similes or stories were these understandable. It is a mistake to take the contents literally. The meaning is right, however. Thought for a long time I, considered all Móglikeiten into consideration and was considered at the end the/that this is the only possible truth. She also gives all appearances and all religions. Take the Gemeinsammkeiten into account here also. I hope to hear of you again. Many greetings Rainer Nemayer